Tracker / Mauritius / 2025 / Anonymised respondent (neighbour)
§ Tracker · Mauritius · DPO · 2025

Anonymised respondent (neighbour)

Enquiry is closed to the satisfaction of all parties. thus, no breach of the data protection act has occurred.. DPO, 13 January 2025.

Record ID
mu-dpo-2025-0186
Case reference
Decision No 186
Jurisdiction
Mauritius
Regulator
DPO
Type
determination
Date decided
13 January 2025
Respondent type
individual
Sector
residential
Violations
CCTV cameras placed facing complainant's private property, cameras alleged to be 360-degree rotating and audio recording devices, failure to consult complainant before placing cameras, cameras placed without respecting 3-foot distance perimeter from boundary wall
Provisions cited
Data Protection Act (as applied by the DPO)
Outcome
enquiry is closed to the satisfaction of all parties. Thus, no breach of the Data Protection Act has occurred.
Status
final
Source
Official document ↗
Record verified
17 July 2026

Summary

The complainant alleged that the neighbour had placed two CCTV cameras facing the complainant's private property, that the cameras were 360-degree rotating audio recording devices, and that no consultation had taken place. A Police site visit found two cameras; after being informed of the complaint, the respondent re-oriented the cameras so they were no longer facing the complainant's premises. The enquiry was closed with a finding that no breach of the Data Protection Act had occurred.

CCTV · NEIGHBOUR DISPUTE · AUDIO RECORDING · CAMERA REPOSITIONED

Cite this decision

DPO (Mauritius), Decision No 186, determination of 13 January 2025. African Data Protection Enforcement Tracker, Law Lab Africa Research, https://research.lawlab.africa/tracker/mauritius/dpo/2025/decision-186-cctv-neighbour-dispute/ (accessed 22 July 2026).

Same respondent


Track Mauritius enforcement

Get decision alerts by email

Tell us your jurisdictions and we email you when a regulator's decision passes verification. Privacy.