Tracker / Mauritius / 2024 / Anonymised respondent (neighbour)
§ Tracker · Mauritius · DPO · 2024

Anonymised respondent (neighbour)

Enquiry is closed to the satisfaction of all parties under section 6 of the data protection act (dpa). DPO, 22 July 2024.

Record ID
mu-dpo-2024-0168
Case reference
Decision No 168
Jurisdiction
Mauritius
Regulator
DPO
Type
determination
Date decided
22 July 2024
Respondent type
individual
Sector
residential
Violations
CCTV cameras installed without complainant's consent and facing towards complainant's house
Provisions cited
section 6 of the Data Protection Act (DPA)
Outcome
enquiry is closed to the satisfaction of all parties under section 6 of the Data Protection Act (DPA)
Status
final
Source
Official document ↗
Record verified
17 July 2026

Summary

The complainant alleged that the respondent had installed CCTV cameras without the complainant's consent and facing the complainant's house. A police site visit found that three CCTV cameras had been repositioned and no camera was capturing images inside the complainant's premises. The enquiry was closed under section 6 of the Data Protection Act.

CCTV · NEIGHBOUR DISPUTE · RESIDENTIAL PRIVACY

Cite this decision

DPO (Mauritius), Decision No 168, determination of 22 July 2024. African Data Protection Enforcement Tracker, Law Lab Africa Research, https://research.lawlab.africa/tracker/mauritius/dpo/2024/decision-168-cctv-neighbour-dispute/ (accessed 22 July 2026).

Same respondent


Track Mauritius enforcement

Get decision alerts by email

Tell us your jurisdictions and we email you when a regulator's decision passes verification. Privacy.