Tracker / Mauritius / 2024 / Anonymised respondent (neighbour)
§ Tracker · Mauritius · DPO · 2024

Anonymised respondent (neighbour)

Enquiry is closed to the satisfaction of all parties under section 6 of the data protection act (dpa). DPO, 25 June 2024.

Record ID
mu-dpo-2024-0166
Case reference
Decision No 166
Jurisdiction
Mauritius
Regulator
DPO
Type
determination
Date decided
25 June 2024
Respondent type
individual
Sector
residential
Violations
Cameras fixed pointing directly towards complainant's wife's and daughter's room and complainant's yard
Provisions cited
section 6 of the Data Protection Act (DPA)
Outcome
enquiry is closed to the satisfaction of all parties under section 6 of the Data Protection Act (DPA)
Status
final
Source
Official document ↗
Record verified
17 July 2026

Summary

The complainant alleged that the respondent had fixed cameras pointing directly towards the complainant's wife's and daughter's room and the complainant's yard. A police site visit confirmed that the cameras were pointing directly towards the complainant's house. The enquiry was closed under section 6 of the Data Protection Act.

CCTV · NEIGHBOUR DISPUTE · RESIDENTIAL PRIVACY

Cite this decision

DPO (Mauritius), Decision No 166, determination of 25 June 2024. African Data Protection Enforcement Tracker, Law Lab Africa Research, https://research.lawlab.africa/tracker/mauritius/dpo/2024/decision-166-cctv-neighbour-dispute/ (accessed 22 July 2026).

Same respondent


Track Mauritius enforcement

Get decision alerts by email

Tell us your jurisdictions and we email you when a regulator's decision passes verification. Privacy.