Tracker / Mauritius / 2021 / Anonymised respondent (neighbour)
§ Tracker · Mauritius · DPO · 2021

Anonymised respondent (neighbour)

No breach of the data protection act, based on enquiry above, has been found committed. DPO, 4 June 2021.

Record ID
mu-dpo-2021-0073
Case reference
Decision No 73
Jurisdiction
Mauritius
Regulator
DPO
Type
determination
Date decided
4 June 2021
Respondent type
individual
Sector
residential
Violations
CCTV camera installed near boundary wall potentially enabling surveillance of complainant's home, two cameras capturing images of other individuals' houses
Provisions cited
Data Protection Act (as applied by the DPO)
Outcome
no breach of the Data Protection Act, based on enquiry above, has been found committed
Status
final
Source
Official document ↗
Record verified
17 July 2026

Summary

The complainant alleged that the respondent had installed a CCTV camera near the boundary wall between their properties, enabling surveillance of the complainant's home. The Data Protection Office investigated, directed the respondent to reposition cameras capturing images of third-party properties, and reviewed footage including from a two-way audio camera. The Commissioner conducted a balancing exercise between the complainant's data protection rights and the respondent's legitimate security interest, finding that no cameras captured the complainant's premises and no breach of the Data Protection Act was committed.

CCTV · NEIGHBOUR DISPUTE · RESIDENTIAL PRIVACY · BALANCING EXERCISE

Cite this decision

DPO (Mauritius), Decision No 73, determination of 4 June 2021. African Data Protection Enforcement Tracker, Law Lab Africa Research, https://research.lawlab.africa/tracker/mauritius/dpo/2021/decision-73-cctv-neighbour-dispute/ (accessed 22 July 2026).

Same respondent


Track Mauritius enforcement

Get decision alerts by email

Tell us your jurisdictions and we email you when a regulator's decision passes verification. Privacy.