Tracker / Mauritius / 2011 / Anonymised respondent (neighbour)
§ Tracker · Mauritius · DPO · 2011

Anonymised respondent (neighbour)

No incriminating evidence; signage direction issued. DPO, 25 April 2011.

Record ID
mu-dpo-2011-0002
Case reference
PMO/DPO/DEC/2
Jurisdiction
Mauritius
Regulator
DPO
Type
determination
Date decided
25 April 2011
Respondent type
individual
Sector
residential
Violations
unlawful surveillance (CCTV) (alleged)
Provisions cited
s.11 DPA 2004, s.12 DPA 2004, s.26(c) DPA 2004
Outcome
no incriminating evidence; signage direction issued
Status
final
Source
Official document ↗
Source integrity
SHA-256 bec54e61d78b212e…
Record verified
30 July 2026

The facts

The complainant alleged that his neighbour and brother installed CCTV cameras angled towards his property, invading his privacy to the point that he could not open his kitchen. A site visit verified the recorded images and found no recording taking place outside the respondent's own premises, and the complainant gave a written declaration that the cameras were not infringing his privacy.

Orders and outcome

The enquiry found no incriminating evidence, but the respondent was required, within two months, to place a visible and legible sign near his entrance informing visitors that CCTV cameras operate for security purposes, and to confirm compliance to the office. The complaint was otherwise set aside as no offence was proven beyond reasonable doubt. Dated 25 April 2011.

CCTV · NEIGHBOUR-DISPUTE · SIGNAGE

Cite this decision

DPO (Mauritius), Anonymised respondent (neighbour), PMO/DPO/DEC/2, determination of 25 April 2011. African Data Protection Enforcement Tracker, Law Lab Africa Research, https://research.lawlab.africa/tracker/mauritius/dpo/2011/decision-2-cctv-neighbour-signage/ (accessed 30 August 2026).

Same respondent


Track Mauritius enforcement

Get decision alerts by email

Tell us your jurisdictions and we email you when a regulator's decision passes verification. Privacy.