Anonymised respondent
Enquiry closed under section 6 (resolved to the satisfaction of all parties). DPO, 9 March 2017.
The facts
A parent alleged that a head mistress of a government primary school took pictures of minor children on a mobile phone, some of which appeared on the internet, that the then PTA president used the school website to insult parents, and that PTA members' signatures were misused. The current head master stated the school has no website and had never known the PTA president in question, and the office found no concrete evidence of an offence. The complainant was given 21 days to produce evidence and did not reply.
Orders and outcome
The enquiry was closed to the satisfaction of all parties with no offence found committed under the Data Protection Act.
Cite this decision
Same respondent
- 17 August 2011 · violation established
- 26 August 2011 · inadvertent disclosure found
- 20 August 2015 · enquiry closed for lack of complainant collaboration
- 20 January 2016 · no offence found
- 14 December 2016 · no offence found
- 6 January 2017 · no offence found
- 6 April 2017 · no breach found after clarifications
- 14 October 2016 · enquiry closed
- 6 May 2019 · no offence found
- 12 June 2012 · referred to police for prosecution (s.20)
- 12 June 2013 · s.22 offence found proved
- 17 December 2018 · enquiry closed under section 6 (resolved to the satisfaction of all parties)
- 10 October 2019 · no offence found
- 17 October 2019 · no offence found
- 22 June 2020 · enquiry closed under section 6 (resolved to the satisfaction of all parties)
- 28 June 2019 · no offence found
Track Mauritius enforcement
Tell us your jurisdictions and we email you when a regulator's decision passes verification. Privacy.