§ Tracker · Mauritius · DPO · 2015
Anonymised respondent (company)
No offence found (cameras non-functional; prohibited area). DPO, 17 June 2015.
Summary
Complainants alleged camera surveillance at a company dump yard. The Commissioner found the complainants were not authorised to access the dump yard, a prohibited area under displayed notice, and the cameras were not functional; no offence was committed.
Cite this decision
DPO (Mauritius), Anonymised respondent (company), determination of 17 June 2015. African Data Protection Enforcement Tracker, Law Lab Africa Research, https://research.lawlab.africa/tracker/mauritius/dpo/2015/decision-26-dump-yard-cameras/ (accessed 22 July 2026).
Same respondent
- 6 January 2016 · no offence found
- 1 February 2013 · no breach established
- 7 October 2016 · enquiry closed for complainant non-response
- 20 June 2016 · enquiry closed for complainant non-response
- 13 February 2017 · no offence found
- 14 February 2017 · no breach found
- 26 June 2019 · corrective measures taken
Track Mauritius enforcement
Tell us your jurisdictions and we email you when a regulator's decision passes verification. Privacy.