Anonymised respondents (2)
No evidence of unlawful disclosure; enquiry closed. DPO, 22 April 2016.
The facts
An ex-employee alleged unauthorised access to and disclosure of his retirement pension information by his former employer and a fellow employee, naming nine respondents in all. The company denied the allegations, suggesting the complaint was made to bring it into disrepute, and statements collected from the staff concerned all denied disclosing the complainant's personal data.
Orders and outcome
Finding no evidence that the retirement pension documents were unlawfully disclosed to anyone not entitled to receive them, and no bad faith in the handling of the pension information, the Commissioner closed the enquiry.
Cite this decision
Same respondent
- 24 June 2011 · no prejudice found (genuine error)
- 14 May 2012 · no offence found
- 12 May 2014 · disclosure held to be processing
Track Mauritius enforcement
Free: a monthly digest of new verified decisions in your chosen jurisdictions. You confirm by email before anything is sent; every alert has an unsubscribe link. Privacy · Terms.