The complainant alleged a breach of confidentiality and privacy through CCTV cameras installed around the ground floor of the residence by the occupier of the first floor, and asked for their removal. A Police enquiry found the respondent had installed the cameras in the open garage for the security of vehicles and that they captured no images towards the complainant's premises.
Orders and outcome
The Data Commissioner closed the enquiry to the satisfaction of all parties, finding that no breach of the Data Protection Act had occurred.
CCTV · SHARED RESIDENCE · PRIVACY
Cite this decision
DPO (Mauritius), Anonymised respondent (individual occupying first floor), Decision No 192, determination of 27 June 2025. African Data Protection Enforcement Tracker, Law Lab Africa Research, https://research.lawlab.africa/tracker/mauritius/dpo/2025/decision-192-cctv-shared-residence/ (accessed 30 August 2026).