Alfred Kandie Tallam v Ukristo Na Ufanisi Sacco Ltd
Complaint upheld; compensation ordered. ODPC, 14 November 2024.
The facts
The complainant kept receiving loan payment demand messages from the Sacco that were addressed to one of its borrowers. The borrower had mistyped his own contact details on his 2013 membership form and 2014 loan application, so the number on file belonged to the complainant. The complainant asked the Sacco by phone and on X to delete his number, and also raised the matter with the Sacco Societies Regulatory Authority and Safaricom, but the messages continued. During a site visit the Sacco admitted sending the messages, and its borrower confirmed the number had been provided in error. The ODPC found the Sacco violated the complainant's right to object and right of erasure by continuing to send the messages after the fourteen-day response windows had lapsed.
Orders and outcome
The respondent was found liable and ordered to pay the complainant Kenya Shillings Five Hundred Thousand (KES 500,000) in compensation. The Office declined the KES 6,000,000 the complainant had claimed, calling it inordinately high and an erroneous estimate of the damage. The stoppage of messages and removal of the complainant's number had already been confirmed during the site visit. Dated 14 November 2024.
Cite this decision
Track Kenya enforcement
Tell us your jurisdictions and we email you when a regulator's decision passes verification. Privacy.