The complainant was pursued over a loan she had never guaranteed for a third party she did not know, and the calls persisted after she asked for them to stop. The determination involved two respondents: the Sacco, which was found to have fulfilled its obligations and directed the debt collector to cease calling her, and the debt collection company, which failed to prove compliance with its obligations and was found to have violated her rights.
Orders and outcome
The first respondent was found not liable. The second respondent, the debt collector, was found liable for violating the complainant's personal data and an enforcement notice was issued against it. Dated December 2023.
DATA-SECURITY · DEBT-COLLECTION · GENERAL · UNLAWFUL-PROCESSING · UPHELD
Cite this decision
ODPC (Kenya), Joy Matheka v Amref Staff Savings and Credit Society Limited and Gleannmore Limited, ODPC Complaint No. 1872 of 2023, determination of 15 December 2023. African Data Protection Enforcement Tracker, Law Lab Africa Research, https://research.lawlab.africa/tracker/kenya/odpc/2023/amref-staff-savings-and-credit-society-limited-gleannmore-li/ (accessed 30 August 2026).